Manhattan Active® Release Testing for Every Platform Update
Manhattan Associates describes Manhattan Active® as a versionless platform, so every platform update lands on your live configuration, your custom extensions, and every integration your operation depends on. Everest runs release testing as a standing program, with automated regression suites, performance validation, and documented evidence for each release, so your teams absorb platform change instead of discovering it on the warehouse floor.
- Functional Regression
- Custom Extension Validation
- Integration and Interface Testing
- Performance and Load Testing
Why Every Manhattan Active® Release Is a Regression Event
Every Manhattan Active® release is a regression event for every customer, because Manhattan Associates ships platform updates onto live configurations whether or not your team has validated them against your configuration:
Manual regression scripts written for go-live and never maintained against the current configuration
Coverage that narrows each cycle, because testing competes with operations for the same super-users
Custom extensions and integrations validated last, if at all, even though they carry concentrated regression risk
No performance testing under peak-volume conditions, so throughput limits are first observed in production at peak volume
Each of those gaps is closed by testing the release before it reaches the floor, not after.
What Manhattan Active® Release Testing Covers
Manhattan Active® release testing covers four layers: functional regression across order and warehouse flows, custom extension and integration validation, performance testing under peak-volume conditions, and documented evidence that operations leadership can approve a release against.
Functional Regression
Automated functional regression across order management, warehouse, labor, slotting, and transportation flows, so the processes your revenue depends on are re-proven on every release cycle.
Custom Extension Validation
Coverage of the logic built on top of the platform, informed by one documented Everest program that covered 33 Manhattan custom modules alongside 47 integrations and 4,722 test scenarios.
Integration and Interface Testing
Testing against ERP, host, commerce, and carrier systems under production-like data volumes, because the boundaries between systems are where release regressions concentrate.
Performance and Load Testing
Validation at peak-volume conditions, so throughput limits surface in a test environment rather than being discovered in production on your highest-volume day.
CI/CD Quality Gates
Coverage and pass-rate thresholds agreed with your team up front, then reported against on every run, so a release either meets the bar or is visibly short of it.
Release Evidence Packs
Executed results, defect records with reproduction steps, and a stated risk position, so operations leadership approves a release against evidence rather than against assurance.
How Everest delivers your Manhattan Active® release testing program
We start with an assessment that establishes what must be covered and what can be automated, working across your applications, sites, custom extensions, integrations, and whatever test assets already exist. That produces a coverage model and a prioritized automation backlog which separates the scenarios worth automating from the ones that are better handled as targeted manual testing.
From there the program becomes a repeating release cycle. Automated suites execute in your pipeline against a production-like data set, defects come back with reproduction steps and a stated risk position for operations leadership, and coverage extends as new sites, new extensions, and new integrations enter production, so the test asset grows with the environment instead of decaying behind it.
What continuous release validation changes for the business
- Every platform update enters production with documented coverage and a stated risk position
- Regression risk concentrated in extensions and integrations gets tested first rather than last
- Super-users stay on the floor, because the regression suite runs without pulling operations staff off shift
- Throughput limits surface in a test environment under peak-volume load rather than in production
- A test asset that compounds in value as it grows with your environment, instead of a script pack that decays
Where Release Testing Fits With the Rest of Your Manhattan Active® Program
Manhattan Active® release testing is a standing capability that sits beside Everest Implementation, Managed Services, Training, and WMS Upgrade services, and it is the one that stays in scope after every other engagement closes, because each new platform release reopens the same regression question.
Talk to Our Quality Engineering Team- Implementation delivers the configuration and the extensions that release testing then re-proves on every update
- Managed Services owns the running environment, while release testing owns the evidence that the next update is safe to take
- Training keeps super-users current as platform updates change what the floor actually sees
- WMS Upgrade moves you onto Manhattan Active in the first place, after which every release reopens the regression question
- Release testing works on an environment another partner implemented, because coverage is built from your live configuration rather than from project documentation

Why a Quality Engineering Practice in the Same House Changes the Result
Everest is a Manhattan Associates Platinum Partner that also runs a full Quality Engineering practice, so test automation, performance engineering, CI/CD quality gate criteria, and managed QA sit alongside Manhattan Active® delivery in the same house rather than inside a separate vendor.
- PlatinumManhattan Associates partner, listed on the consulting-partner directory
- 2xManhattan Partner of the Year: Commerce Services 2022, Collaboration Excellence 2023
- 4,722Test scenarios on one documented program, beside 47 integrations and 33 custom modules
Frequently Asked Questions
Manhattan Active® release testing is the recurring validation of your configurations, extensions, and integrations against each platform update Manhattan Associates ships. Manhattan Associates describes Manhattan Active as a versionless platform, so each update lands on your live configuration and every customer carries a continuing regression obligation. Everest runs that validation as a standing service rather than a one-off project.
Manhattan Associates describes Manhattan Active as versionless, which means you no longer choose whether to take an update, so the platform changes underneath your live configuration whether or not anyone has tested it. Regression testing turns that from an open operational risk into a routine, evidenced check across order capture, allocation, wave, pick, pack, ship, and returns.
The number depends on your process footprint, integration count, and custom extension surface, rather than on a standard figure. For scale reference, one documented Everest program covered 4,722 test scenarios alongside 47 integrations and 33 Manhattan custom modules. Everest sizes your suite against the flows your revenue actually depends on.
Yes, most of a regression suite automates. Everest builds automated coverage at the user interface, API, and integration layers, plus the data setup and teardown each run needs, so every release cycle reruns identical evidence. Exploratory testing and operational judgment on edge cases stay with people, because automation handles those poorly.
Yes. Custom extensions and integrations are where release regressions surface, because they sit on the platform boundaries Manhattan Associates changes. On one documented Everest program, coverage spanned 47 integrations and 33 Manhattan custom modules alongside 4,722 test scenarios, so test design covers extension behavior, ERP and host interfaces, carrier connections, and the data contracts between them.
Manhattan Active release testing is an ongoing engagement, because every platform update carries its own regression risk. Scope drives the commercial shape: site count, breadth of processes, number of integrations, extension surface, and how much automation already exists. Everest sizes those in an assessment first, then runs each release cycle against an agreed, measurable scope.
Yes. Everest starts with a discovery of your configuration, extensions, integrations, and any existing test assets, then builds the regression suite from your live process reality rather than from project documentation. Everest can put testing discipline around a Manhattan Active environment that a different partner delivered, building coverage from your live configuration.
Managed Services owns the running environment, covering L2 and L3 support, monitoring, and incident resolution. Release testing owns the evidence of whether the next platform update breaks your operation. The two services pair well, and release testing remains a Quality Engineering discipline with its own automation assets and coverage reporting.
Ready to Stop Discovering Regressions on the Floor?
Tell us which Manhattan Active® applications, sites, extensions, and integrations you run, and we will scope the coverage model and the automation backlog against your environment.
Talk to Our Quality Engineering Team